At the end of the day, there are no absolutes. Like I mentioned in my book 'LESSONS FROM 15,000 FIRST DATES', 'Strange as it sounds, the reality is that plain Janes sometimes have it better.' This is based on the premise that most plain Janes I have met are more realistic, reasonable and are more willing to compromise. Having said that, I have also met Plain Janes who are unwilling to compromise and I have met beautiful women who after a lot of experiences who are willing to compromise. Hence, the same applies to average Joes. There are average Joes that are realistic, reasonable, down-to-earth set of dating criteria and are more willing to compromise. At the same time, there are also average Joes who told me, "Violet, I know I am a 5, and I know you are matching me with a 5. But I want to be matched with a 10!" Some men who are gorgeous and know it and when coupled with financial stability would sometimes suffer from what I call the 'elevator syndrome'. When the go to the first floor, they met someone who's pretty. They then wonder to themselves, I wonder if someone on the second floor would even be better. I want someone who's pretty and smart. And there she was at the second floor. Then they would wonder if they can meet someone even 'better' on the third floor e.g. pretty, smart and curvy. So on and so forth. As compared to the average Joes, who might know that they are not as good-looking or as suave or as confident, and are simply on the lookout for a kind and nurturing woman who would make a good wife. And once they have met her, they are more likely to settle down. Men and women are different and hence when it comes to dating criteria, they are also looking out for different things. Just like some men will put women into two categories when it comes to dating and relationship i.e. the 'wife material a.k.a. they will bring home to see mum type' and the 'short fling type', often some women will also put men into two categories - 'the provider' and 'the player'. Having said that, there are average Joes who are average in their looks but have honed their 'player' skills and are able to attract women to them like bees to honey because they just know how to push the right buttons. There are also gorgeous hunks who are actually very down-to-earth and is a total sweetheart when it comes to love and is also a perfect gentleman. 'Players' need not necessarily be gorgeous hunks. Sometimes, they just portray a sense of coolness, a sense of confidence or even a sense of danger that appeal to women. They seem so in control and they just know what to say and do at the right time. And thus, women tend to be more attracted to 'the player' than 'the provider'. Many a times, women would go for 'the player' to only get burnt at the end of the day because 'the player' does not tend to want to settle down because he knows that he has a huge following and know he just know what to do to make girls fall for him. And thus, eventually women learn to see beyond the facade and to look out for things that matter - dependability, loyalty, sense of responsibility - criteria that would make a good companion, a good husband and a good father. Many of these characteristics actually describe 'the provider'. I think ultimately, if we are talking about having and sustaining a long term relationship, 'the provider' (which most of the time would be the dating strategy of the average Joes) will be the one who is the ultimate winner as compared to 'the player' who seems to get all the girls in the beginning. 'The player' will be the biggest loser because he will never be able to sustain a long term relationship even though he seems to be the one having all the fun at first. When men are looking for the right one, looks and physical appearances tend to rank high because most men are very visual. However, when women are looking for the right one, they tend to take a more overall approach. I am not saying that looks are not important to all women. However, most women also look out for other things such as financial stability, sense of humour, confidence etc. other than looks before they judge whether to take the relationship to the next level. Thus, looks is not the only thing that women are looking for. Of course, there are also women who shun gorgeous men. There are some lady clients that I have met who will say that, "Violet, please don't introduce me to someone who's too good-looking!" I think, in their mind, they are thinking that women will always be attracted to good-looking men and they do not want to have unnecessary competition in future. But having said that, there are also women who say to me, "Violet, make sure you pick the best looking man for me, ok?" However, I would have to say, there are more women saying, "Violet, make sure you find me a good man who's kind, confident and humorous!" rather than "Make sure you find me a good-looking man!" WHAT DO YOU THINK? DO YOU THINK GORGEOUS HUNKS HAVE IT BETTER? OR AVERAGE JOES? SHARE WITH US YOUR COMMENTS!Share on FacebookVIOLET LIM VIOLET LIM is a real-life modern matchmaker who has founded Asia's leading lunch dating company Lunch Actually (www.lunchactually.com). Violet is the bestselling author of the dating book 'Lessons From 15,000 First Dates'. She is also an acknowledged dating and relationship expert who has been featured on more than 1000 media coverage including ABC News 20/20, Bloomberg, CNBC Asia, CNN Go, Channel News Asia, USA Today, TV Tokyo and Singapore's National Day Video 2005 as one of Singapore's most aspiring people. Violet is happily married to her university sweetheart Jamie and they have two young children. More Posts - Website RELATED POSTS: *
0 comments:
Post a Comment