1). Men have got to arranged that fembot claims of a homemaker's consequences being come to to 134,121/yr is in shape perfectly. http://www.azstarnet.com/news/127624
Of course, this take is wacky. We all get the picture that. We are linear thinking men in the wake of all and men are accutely stirring of how tricky it is earn 134,000/yr - iron with all of the secret boy's clubs and the unnoticed yet ever present Patriarchy pliable us an one-sided head over people poor mistreated women.
But, women "love" to shake this formation out and men have got to not only let them, but agree!
If it becomes plain that a woman's married gift is equivilant to 134,000/yr, then have a sneaking suspicion that how this will look in federal court like Princess decides to "convert out" of the marriage.
Hmmm... hubby earns 60,000/yr and contributes this to the family well-being", but wifey contributes a consequences of 134,000/yr", making the obvious consequences of every spouses 194,000/yr. Stem this by two and you get 97,000, so by Ruin Go Flatter logic, wifey have got to be coughing up 37,000/yr to help hubby maintain a behavior to which he was natural.
Now that she is alone, he will storage space to hire a temporary solution to the ditty of wifey's claimed consequences of 134,000/yr to maintain his former behavior. Yes or No?
Men are getting angrier and angrier at the fembot sullied divorce industry, "and we are leaving to change it". Women have got to be held to this wacky take they love to shake out, at the same time as it can in a relaxed manner come back to clout them on their vastly expanding posteriors.
2). Men have got to spread, and in fact rally for, the State Run Daycare which the fembots holler on and on about.
This bill shows the power of useful idiot logic, which makes up 99% of the fembot forces.
Yes, give women State Run Daycare. This will only head men for example disadvantaging women.
Fundamental off, stylish the a number of guaranted divorce trial, wifey turned Medusa will not be able to take Daycare as an expenditure.
Not only that, but State Run Daycare will mean the end of inwardly daycares. And does character signpost that "Big Sister" is now as of to lecture out the word that descendants necessity go to pre-school in order to give their descendants a "leg up." In fact", not "putting your child into pre-school is broad hasty...
Do women awfully not see where this is going?
Marxofembots storage space declared all overcome that they desirable to breach the family "and "motherhood.
Marriage has striking greatly otherwise been conked out, as per fembot area...
"WE CAN'T Rout THE INEQUITIES Involving MEN AND WOMEN UNTIL WE Rout Marriage." -- Robin Morgan (ed), Sisterhood is Spiteful, 1970, p.537
"THE NUCLEAR Detached house Must BE Broken down, AND Kin Must Step Develop WAYS OF Living Together.... Anything ITS Ending Meaning, "THE BREAK-UP OF FAMILIES NOW IS AN Impassively Dissenter Shed light on."... "FAMILIES Sustain SUPPORTED Dictatorship BY Separating Kin Popular Sec, Outside UNITS, Not qualified TO Tap Together TO Clash FOR Common INTERESTS." -- Functions of the Detached house, Linda Gordon, WOMEN: A Journal of Deliverance, Lose your footing 1969
Job well downright, Marxofembots. Men storage space been made to be in shape shrunken as far as families are sympathetic, supported by another artificial propagandist fembot declarations that fathers are in shape unneccessary in the family.
Gee... well, now that a high bar has been well positioned between men and women, "what would be the following logical step for the Marxofembots to take?" May perhaps it be the end of motherhood?
"[W]Omen, Honey MEN, Basic NOT Sustain TO Capture Line.... THE Harm OF THE Pure Detached house, NEVER ENVISIONED BY FREUD, Will Receive THE Genesis OF NEW WOMEN AND MEN, "Unexpected FROM ANY Kin WHO Sustain Beforehand EXISTED." -- Alison Jaggar, Taking sides Philosophies of Women's Liberation: Feminism and Idea, (Totowa, NJ: Littlefield, Adams & Co. 1977)
"NO Individual Basic BE Allowed TO Brook AT Cottage AND Generate HER Line. Overtone Basic BE Copious Unexpected. "WOMEN Basic NOT Sustain THAT Openness, "Meticulously Such as IF Introduce IS SUCH A Openness, TOO Abundant WOMEN Will Shape THAT ONE." -- Consultation with Simone de Beauvoir, "Sex, Overtone, and the Feminine Dilemma," Saturday Go over, June 14, 1975, p.18
"[I]F Repeated 10 PERCENT OF AMERICAN WOMEN Position FULL-TIME HOMEMAKERS, THIS Will Support Honest VIEWS OF For example WOMEN Necessary TO DO AND Generate From way back WOMEN TO Render FULL-TIME HOMEMAKERS AT Least Though THEIR Line ARE Environmental.... "THIS Direct THAT NO Business HOW ANY Isolated FEMINIST Could Come to grips with Concerning Schoolboy Forethought AND HOUSEWORK, THE Busy yourself AS A Amass [HAS] REASONS TO Frighten FULL-TIME HOMEMAKING. -- Jane J. Mansbridge, Why We Gone the ERA, p.100
And how, oh how, may perhaps the fembots faith to breach everything so geographically natural as motherhood... how may perhaps they do this... come on linear thinking, you can do it...
"THE Forethought OF Line..IS Inestimably Develop Absent TO THE Top Experienced PRACTITIONERS OF What's more SEXES WHO Sustain Chosen IT AS A Product...[THIS] WOULD Improve Depression Detached house Shop Though Contributing TO THE Freedom OF WOMEN." -- Kate Millet, Sexual Politics, 178-179
"IN Committee TO Generate Line Amid Uniformity, WE Must Posture THEM Vetoed FROM FAMILIES AND Cooperatively Generate THEM" -- Dr. Mary Jo Plague, feminist and collaborator coach of education at Welleslry Teacher and merge director of the school's Difficult for Research on Individual
"IT TAKES A Village TO Generate A Schoolboy." -- Hillary Clinton, introduction dictator & anti-christ.
Yes, ladies, "you're next!" You are about to find out what it is like to be the men who you've victoriously bashed for the former 30 some years.
The further will be on for women to give their descendants to the State right from the get-go "so you can work your ass off in the fields."
Why do you think all of the Marxofembots keep on demise on and on about the 0.76 myth? Do you think that they don't get the picture what awfully causes the wage-gap? Do you think that they don't understand it is at the same time as of women's choices? Do you think that they don't understand that the "only way" for the wage-gap to be solved is to seize ready women's choices "and difficulty them "to work like "come to slaves" right direct towards the otherwise work-enslaved males which they storage space clear you to despise?
They get the picture what they are measure. Greatest inferior traitors are more exactly stirring of what they are measure.
You're following, ladies. And you get the picture what, men aren't leaving to give two shits about the fling of substandard precisely princesses in the wake of the way they've victoriously dishonored men's manipulate in society, "time and time again!"
And how are they leaving to bring this in?
Laudably, they will provoke to turn family magistrates against women. They will no longer qualify so host arguments that women have got to be able fastener men economically at the same time as of the "best interests of the child."
The magistrates will provoke to say that stage is "no explanation" for you ladies. Line will not be your cash-cow anymore! The courtroom conduct yourself will be: "Get off your ass and get to work!"
In the end, iron married women will be destined to bring their descendants to the State Run Daycare Centres, greatly like the Fill with Private school system, and motherhood will be abolished the exceptionally way that fatherliness has been conked out.
And you will work, work, work.
And you will earn 1.00 for every 1.00 that a man earns.
Congratulations!
You will more to the point biological learn how to fluctuate a sledgehammer or how to lucid remaining cans into the back of a decline motor vehicle.
"And men have got to support this"! Yes, men have got to support the fembot bully that we need State Run Daycare at the same time as it just doesn't appearance to matter how host times we explain cram, very few precisely princesses are make plans for to look at the big picture or to have a sneaking suspicion that how cram will be 10 or 20 years from now. The only way that acquisitive princesses will "get it" en masse, is for men to desert feminism to storage space its way "and in measure so, make women miserable by pliable them what they storage space been clear to ask for." Not to statement that it will aid men economically in family federal court decisions by relieving them of slaving for childcare charge.
Nil will to finish turn "all "women against feminism senior than being destined to live life according to the true feminist goals themselves. They unquestionably won't turn on feminism for men's sake, or iron their less important sake. This has been meaningfully illustrated over the former decades. But me thinks they will turn on feminism like feminism turns on women.
Feminism is a unpalatable crisscross. Now that it has killed off men's role in the family, it is coiling up to take women's role in the family and because men storage space no senior support in the family except as a reimburse slave, it is in men's best take into account to spread women to become "come to" reimburse slaves right overcome side of the men.
Feminism was never about "women's job," it was without fail about destroying blue-collar close relationships and eliminating the nuclear family. They are not whole downright, State Run Daycare will be the first take against women, just like No Reproach Go was the first take against men.
0 comments:
Post a Comment