The Kissing Balance Of Sickness

The paradox is a average one.

One of the lovers is under the weather.

The older is not.

Do you withdraw from kissing that person, so as not to filter him/her?

OR

Do you "wuv dem sooooo considerably dat" getting under the weather is exploit the few prized kisses and you filter them anyway?

Commendably, let a snappish hearted economist end some forethought.

Say one of you is under the weather.

This precludes you from kissing your beau/babe for the time that person is tainted with the disorder. That person suffers, and you don't get to kiss him/her. But robotically that person will recover and for that reason you can get back to "sickness-free kissin' time."

But if you are of the "kisses are exploit the sickness" philosophy, for that reason you too are leave-taking to get under the weather.

If you get under the weather and the older person recovers, for that reason all you keep managed to do is sincerely put that person in the frank precise position you were in, Hence PREVENTING THE Conclude Identical Worth OF KISSING.

So (ornament to my SAEG (tm))

It is best to let the person be, NOT KISS YOUR Summit Shortened, keep "girls weekend" or "guys weekend," and let them perfectly recover, for if you do, for that reason you

1. won't get under the weather

2. won't lose out on any greater kisses than you would suitably (such as of the duality of sickness)

3. and will halve the sick-kissing time, replacing it with "healthy-kissing time."

I am pleased I keep solved this life-long paradox, making life easier for millions of launch duration people.

You may send a response to your ornament by shopping at Amazon or trade one of my innumerable SAEG (tm) books.HHR4HM7ZPMV3